设为首页 电子邮箱 联系我们

本刊最新招聘信息请见“通知公告”!  本刊投稿系统试运行中,欢迎投稿!如投稿有问题,可直接将稿件发送至zgyy8888@163.com

 

主管单位:中华人民共和国   

国家卫生健康委员会

主办单位:
总编辑:
杨秋

编辑部主任:吴翔宇

邮发代号:80-528
定价:28.00元
全年:336.00元
Email:zgyy8888@163.com
电话(传真):010-64428528;
010-64456116(总编室)

                  

2021 年第 6 期 第 16 卷

系统免疫炎症指数在脓毒症严重程度和预后判断中的应用价值

Value of systemic immune inflammatory index in judging severity and prognosis of sepsis

作者:陈小莹陈忆青

英文作者:Chen Xiaoying Chen Yiqing

单位:浙江省台州市第一人民医院全科医学科318020

英文单位:Department of General Medicine Taizhou First People′s Hospital Zhejiang Province Taizhou 318020 China

关键词:脓毒症;系统免疫炎症指数;严重程度;预后

英文关键词:Sepsis;Systemicimmuneinflammatoryindex;Severity;Prognosis

  • 摘要:
  • 目的 探讨系统免疫炎症指数(SII)在脓毒症严重程度和预后判断中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析20181月至201912月浙江省台州市第一人民医院诊治的115例脓毒症患者的临床资料,根据患者是否发生脓毒性休克,将其分为脓毒性休克组(65例)和非脓毒性休克组(50例);根据28 d转归情况,将其分为存活组(85例)和死亡组(30例)。比较不同组间SII、急性生理学和慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHEⅡ)及序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。分析SIIAPACHEⅡ及SOFA评分的相关性及三者对脓毒症预后的评估价值。结果 脓毒性休克组SIIAPACHEⅡ及SOFA评分均高于非脓毒性休克组[1 4556752 536)比385335,496)、(25.3±1.1)分比(10.7±2.2)分、(18.3±5.2)分比(9.3±2.6)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。死亡组SIIAPACHEⅡ及SOFA评分均高于存活组[2 3561 753,2 534)比286203,913)、(28.3±7.3)分比(16.3±4.3)分、(23.5±12.3)分比(13.2±3.5)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示,SIIAPACHE Ⅱ及SOFA评分均呈正相关(r=0.5620.534,均P<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析结果显示,SII评估脓毒症患者预后的曲线下面积大于APACHE Ⅱ及SOFA评分且敏感度高于APACHE Ⅱ、SOFA评分。结论 SII有助于帮助脓毒症患者病情严重程度及预后的判断,可用作一项评估指标。

  • Objective To investigate the value of systemic immune inflammatory index (SII) in judging severity and prognosis of sepsis. Methods From January 2018 to December 2019, clinical data of 115 patients with sepsis admitted to Taizhou First Peoples Hospital, Zhejiang Province were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the patients had septic shock, they were divided into septic shock group (65 cases) and non septic shock group (50 cases); according to the outcomes of 28 d, patients were divided into survival group (85 cases) and death group (30 cases). The SII, scores of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were compared among the different groups. The correlation between SII level and APACHE , SOFA scores, and the value of those in evaluating the prognosis of sepsis were analyzed. Results The SII, APACHE  and SOFA scores in septic shock group were higher than those in non septic shock group 1 4556752 536 vs 385335,496,25.3±1.1 vs 10.7±2.2,18.3±5.2 vs 9.3±2.6)](all P<0.05). The SII, APACHE  and SOFA scores in death group were higher than those in survival group 2 3561 753,2 534 vs 286203,913,28.3±7.3 vs 16.3±4.3,23.5±12.3 vs 13.2±3.5)](all P<0.05). Pearson correlated analysis showed that SII was positively correlated with APACHE  and SOFA scores(r=0.562, 0.534, both P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve of SII to assess the outcome of sepsis patients was larger than that of APACHE  and SOFA scores; the sensitivity of SII was higher than that of APACHE  and SOFA scores. Conclusion SII can help to determine the severity and prognosis of patients with sepsis.

copyright
地址:北京市朝阳区安贞路2号首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院北楼二层
电话:010-64456116 传真:010-64428528 邮编:100029 Email: zgyy8888@163.com
网址: 京ICP备2020043099号-3

当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱zgyy8888@163.com。







安卓


苹果

关闭
Baidu
map