主管单位:中华人民共和国
国家卫生健康委员会
主办单位:
总编辑:杨秋
编辑部主任:吴翔宇
邮发代号:80-528
定价:28.00元
全年:336.00元
Email:zgyy8888@163.com
电话(传真):010-64428528;
010-64456116(总编室)
关键词:
英文关键词:
目的 比较二甲硅油内镜下直接喷洒法与口服法在透明帽辅助结肠息肉切除术中对结肠息肉检出数目和结肠气泡分级的影响。方法 入选2017年6—11月于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院消化内科门诊行透明帽辅助结肠镜检查发现结肠息肉并入院行内镜下息肉电切术患者120例,将患者完全随机分为口服组、喷洒组及联合组,各40例。所有患者门诊初次行透明帽辅助结肠镜检查前6 h和入院后结肠镜复查前6 h口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散剂,口服组于聚乙二醇电解质散清洁肠道后口服二甲硅油乳剂20 ml,喷洒组于肠镜检查退镜过程中根据肠道气泡情况按需喷洒二甲硅油乳剂20 ml,联合组于聚乙二醇电解质散清洁肠道后口服二甲硅油乳剂20 ml,并于肠镜检查退镜过程中根据肠道气泡情况按需再喷洒二甲硅油乳剂20 ml。比较3组患者门诊初次结肠镜检查及住院使用二甲硅油后复查过程中结肠息肉检出数目及结肠气泡分级的差异。结果 口服组、喷洒组、联合组入院使用二甲硅油后结肠镜复查结肠息肉检出数目均高于门诊初次检查时[3(2,4)枚比2(1,3)枚,4(3,5)枚比3(2,4)枚,4(2,5)枚比2(1,4)枚],结肠气泡分级均低于初次检查时[1(1,2)级比2(2,3)级,1(1,1)级比2(2,3)级,1(1,1)级比2(2,3)级],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。使用二甲硅油后,喷洒组和联合组结肠息肉检出增加数目和结肠气泡分级改善情况均明显优于口服组[1(0,1)、1(0,1)枚比0(0,1)枚;1(1,2)、1(0,2)级比1(0,1)级],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),而喷洒组和联合组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 二甲硅油内镜下直接喷洒法简便易行,且能够增加结肠息肉检出数目,减少肠道气泡,效果优于口服法。
Objective To investigate the effects of direct spraying and oral Methods of simethicone on detection number of colonic polyps and classification of colonic bubbles during endoscopic transparent plastic cap-assisted colonic polypectomy. Methods Totally 120 patients who were diagnosed of colonic polyps by transparent plastic cap-assisted colonoscopy at outpatient department of gastroenterology from June to November 2017 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University were enrolled, and they were randomly divided into oral group, spraying group and combination group, with 40 patients in each group. All patients had reexamination of colonoscopy after admission. All groups took compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder 6 h before colonoscopy; the oral group took 20 ml simethicone emulsion after administration of polyethylene glycol; the spraying group had 20 ml simethicone emulsion during the withdrawing process of colonoscopy according to the condition of colonic bubbles; the combination group were treated by both of the oral and spraying Methods . Detection number of colonic polyps and colonic bubble classification were analyzed. Results Detection numbers of colon polyps of reexamination of colonoscopy were significantly more than those of the first examination in all groups[3(2,4) vs 2(1,3), 4(3,5) vs 3(2,4), 4(2,5) vs 2(1,4)]; colonic bubble classifications of reexamination were significantly lower than those of the first examination[1(1,2) vs 2(2,3), 1(1,1) vs 2(2,3), 1(1,1) vs 2(2,3)](P<0.05). With application of simethicone, rise in the detection number of colonic polyps was significantly more and change of colonic bubble classification in spraying group was significantly better than those in oral group[1(0,1), 1(0,1) vs 0(0,1); 1(1,2), 1(0,2) vs 1(0,1)](P<0.05); there were no significant differences between spraying group and combination group(P>0.05). Conclusion Direct spraying of simethicone during colonoscopy can help to reduce colonic bubbles and detect more polyps.
copyright
地址:北京市朝阳区安贞路2号首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院北楼二层
电话:010-64456116 传真:010-64428528 邮编:100029 Email: zgyy8888@163.com
网址: 京ICP备2020043099号-3
当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱zgyy8888@163.com。